Racial Conditioning: Has Pop Culture Set the Stage for a Black President?
Greg Braxton writes in Sunday’s Los Angeles Times:
There’s a somewhat surprising consensus that admirable black fictional figures may have subtly conditioned the electorate to be receptive to a candidate like Obama, the presumptive Democratic standard-bearer.
“One wonders to what degree a scenario played out in a safe, contained, fictionalized context might have prepared people for the real thing,” said Darnell Hunt, a professor of sociology and director of the Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies at UCLA. “Popular culture is more than mere entertainment. It gives us a dress rehearsal for the real thing. We can imagine who we are and who we would like to be.”
Make-believe black presidents occupy an odd little corner of pop culture, a territory that a few notable films and television programs have staked out.
The piece makes some unsubstantiated psychological leaps, but it is worth it simply for the history it provides of black presidents on the big and small screen. It sent me on a search, for example, to find more info about a short film, “Rufus Jones for President” (1933), starring a very young Sammy Davis Jr. as a black 7-year-old elected president (see it here) and about a a full-length film “The Man” (1972), starring James Earl Jones “that is largely credited with being the first serious treatment of a black man becoming president”:
Based on an Irving Wallace novel, the movie starred James Earl Jones as the Senate president pro tem who suddenly ascends to the Oval Office after the untimely deaths of the president and speaker of the House and the illness of the vice president.
In the poster for the film, Jones is pictured taking the oath of office at a ceremony populated by white politicians. The tag line for the movie reads “The first black president of the United States. First they swore him in. Then they swore to get him.”
Braxton interviews at length the minds behind two more recent representations of black presidents: the satirical film “Head of State,” in which Chris Rock plays May Gilliam, an ordinary man who ascends to the presidency, and the television series “24,” which began, maybe more radically, in the middle of the presidency of David Palmer (portrayed by Dennis Haysbert)., in which the qualifications of David Palmer (Dennis Haysbert) for the highest office were never questioned.
Worthwhile photo galleries accompany the article.
The only issue I have with the article — and this is true for much coverage of pop culture in the mainstream media — is it focuses too heavily on how “life imitates art,” how pop culture is a progressive, forward-thinking force.
While I wouldn’t deny the power of pop culture to change minds, I think it is equally important that we put pop culture in its own historical context — and see it reflecting the anxieties and prejudices of its day, even as it imagines such a “progressive” scenario as a black presidency.
With the exception of David Palmer on “24″ — where a black presidency was accepted as matter-of-fact — all the other representations that Braxton notes can be seen as actually regressive.
It’s telling that on the DVD commentary to “Head of State” Chris Rock says, “I don’t know if I’ll see a black president in my lifetime.” While Braxton sees this as a laughable “misunderstanding,” he ignores that fact that the intention of the Rock’s film was not to lay the groundwork for a future black presidency — it was to express how much racism is an almost impenetrable obstacle to black leadership.












Don’t forget the Onion’s take on the cinematic perils of a black presidency:
http://www.theonion.com/content/opinion/do_we_really_want_another_black
Posted by Pete Warden on June 25th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Not to be pedantic (eh, who am I kidding?), but 24 began during the Democratic Presidential primaries, which David Palmer was contesting. He wasnt President untill season 2.
Posted by Gimpy on June 25th, 2008 at 9:45 am
Thanks, Gimpy. I’ve made the correction above. I was thinking of the start of season 2.
In one way, having to make the correction lessens the power of my argument that “24″ was somehow a more radical representation. But if I remember correctly now, Palmer’s race during the primary campaign — and even during the assasination plot — wasn’t in the foreground. That’s still pretty significant.
Posted by Bernie Heidkamp on June 26th, 2008 at 1:50 pm