what's on pop

Race and Fear Together Again



The Clinton campaign resorted to race baiting early and often in this election season. And lately they’ve moved on to fear mongering.

But, after reading Orlando Patterson’s New York Times op-ed today, I might have to coin a new phrase: racial fear mongering baiting. OK, that phrase isn’t going anywhere — but Patterson’s analysis of the racial undertones in Clinton’s now infamous “3 a.m.” ad should:

I have spent my life studying the pictures and symbols of racism and slavery, and when I saw the Clinton ad?s central image — innocent sleeping children and a mother in the middle of the night at risk of mortal danger — it brought to my mind scenes from the past. I couldn’t help but think of D. W. Griffith’s “Birth of a Nation,” the racist movie epic that helped revive the Ku Klux Klan, with its portrayal of black men lurking in the bushes around white society. The danger implicit in the phone ad — as I see it — is that the person answering the phone might be a black man, someone who could not be trusted to protect us from this threat.

This reading shouldn’t have surprised me — pandering to America’s racial prejudices and manipulating America’s fears, of course, have never been mutually exclusive. But I did miss it on my first, cursory viewings of the ad — maybe because I quickly saw and dismissed its evocations of early LBJ and Mondale fear-based ads.

With this perspective, the fact that many voters in Ohio and elsewhere might have fallen for it makes me even more depressed that I already was.

One sign of hope, though, might be that the sleeping white girl that is the initial focus of the ad (the opening sequence is actually old stock footage) is a big Obama supporter — and is letting everyone know it. She’s not sleeping anymore, it seems.

My broader hope is that Americans are not buying this stuff anymore. In this media-saturated political age, in fact, Americans have — maybe unwittingly — become fairly sophisticated viewers of all of these verbal and visual machinations. The initial race baiting, after all, came back to bite the Clintons.

The media will need to help, though. They’ll need to make a bigger deal out of Clinton’s “as far as I know” response to a question about Obama’s religious background.

And they’ll need to jump all over Geraldine Ferraro’s latest series of comments about how Obama is only winning because he’s a black man and she’s only being criticized for thinking that because she’s white.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • PopCurrent

One Response to “Race and Fear Together Again”

  1. Nathan Says:

    Are you delusional?! Where the hell does one start with such nonsense? My God, even Media Matters covered the ridiculousness that was the 60 Minutes question. First of all, for a piece so depressed about alleged race baiting (way to omit Jesse Jackson, Jr.’s bizarre rant about how Hillary Clinton was a racist because she didn’t cry on camera for Katrina, Kerry’s remarks that one should vote for him because he’s black, the D-Punjab letter, or the truly racist reply by McCaskill that Obama is the first black leader to not present himself as a victim!) it’s hilarious you continue to believe that being Muslim is a smear. Thanks! I’m sure many Muslims around the world are just tickled pink about that.

    Second, (if you actually bothered to see the entire interview) she immediately responded with, “Of course, not.” Kroft kept badgering her until she said, “…as far as I know.” And you know what?! She can’t prove what his religion is! No one can! Good God!

    Support Obama. But try to manage without engaging in a petty smear campaign, especially one that exploits the most explosive charge possible–racism. Truly irresponsible. It makes a mockery of legitimate racism. As a Latino myself, this is beyond disgusting.

    Lastly, why the hell would Clinton even bother injecting race to it when she gets slaughtered for by a media that is hellbent on destroying her? She doesn’t. Now why would Obama continue to have his high level staff and supporters actually inject race (e.g., smearing Clinton as racist) if it hurt him? He wouldn’t because it only benefits him.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word