More on “Die Hard” and What It Costs for Men to “Live Free”
Here’s a little addendum to Mark’s spot-on analysis of the construction of masculinity in the latest “Die Hard” film:
One of the most disturbing parts of the film is the portrayal of villain’s sidekick — an unnamed Asian woman played by the very talented Maggie Q. In many ways, she is the prototypical modern action movie femme fatale — with all the sexist baggage that it implies. Despite her obvious intelligence, leadership skills, and martial arts prowess, her sexual allure is the camera’s — and the narrative’s — primary concern.
And, of course, she’s evil and will eventually die at the hands our hero — because any capable woman must in a story which is, as Mark points out so well, “a template for how the most conservative (and often reductive American ideas) about gender and power can remain firmly in place.”
While this portrayal is regrettable, though, it is not very surprising. What drops the jaws of many viewers is the virulent racist edge to it all.
After the extended fight scene in which John McClane, our hero, kills Maggie Q’s character — who not surprisingly has been sexually involved with Thomas Gabriel, the villain — McClane refers to her at various times as “your little bitch Asian girlfriend,” “little Asian chick,” and “Asian hooker bitch.” He also mocks Gabriel about his “hot Asian ninja hookers.”
And, if we had any doubts of the sexual nature of his “conquest,” McClane also tells Gabriel that he can find her “at the bottom of an elevator shaft with an SUV rammed up her ass.”
I’ll leave it to Slant Eye for the Round Eye and Reappropriate to break down the scene further.
Considering the hushed response of the theater audience, Slant Eye for the Round Eye wonders “if the studio executives - like Bert Livingston who called the character Bruce Willis plays an ‘everyman’ - used a group of white racists for the focus group.”
And Jenn at Reappropriate makes the connection to the equally disturbing new “Rush Hour” trailer.
Both of them also have a lot to say about the racial stereotypes at play.
What is also interesting is how it all leads back to the construction of masculinity. In fact, this overdetermined assertion of McClane’s racial and sexual superiority reminds me of McClane’s rampant homophobia in “Die Hard: With a Vengeance,” the third film in the series. His conversations with Simon Gruber, Jeremy Iron’s character — who stutters when he’s anxious — are laced with puns about anal sex and references to Gruber’s supposed effeminacy.
Gruber is also involved with a femme fatale, who this time happens to be, a little more innocuously, a blonde German woman.
All of this analysis also dovetails with several new looks at the real and perceived crisis in masculinity. John Ibson has written “Picturing Men: A Century of Male Relationships in Everyday American Photography” — part of which he summarizes in a recent article in American Sexuality. Through personal observations and a close historical analysis of photos of men, Ibson argues that American culture has erased — and therefore demonized — intimacy between men.
As a result, the only path toward manhood is the one John McClane takes — through violent confrontation.
C.J. Pascoe comments on the depressing nature — and the real-world consequences — of this traditional male coming-of-age ritual in her new book “Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School,” part of which she summarizes for Inside Higher Ed. Pascoe notes that boys participate in a “fag discourse” (which is distinct from boys calling each other “gay”) in order that they can “ensure that others saw them as masculine by renouncing any fag-like behavior or same-sex desire.”
Finally, Echidne of the Snakes has her own fascinating mediation of what being “effete,” “effeminate” and “emasculated” really means in American culture.
Suffice to say, after reading around these issues, it becomes clear that a character like John McClane — far from being the stable site for the recovery of an old-school masculinity that the film wants him to be — is actually full of cracks and contradictions.












July 23, 2007 at 12:44 pm
While I am impressed with Mark’s deconstruction of the patriarchal subtext in DH4 (which I frankly doubt the screenwriters would be surprised to hear), I think claims of racism in the character of McClane are overblown.
It seems to me the racist and homophobic statements McClane directs at Gabriel, and Gruber, were meant to deliberately antagonize them, to make them lose cool and feel less in control. This tactic may have been motivated by a perceived sensitivity of the villains to these come-ons (life-long outsiders, now at the precipice their long-deliberated moment of revenge, being forced to again deal with these same torments) or to portray himself as a typically ignorant cop, so he might not be taken seriously. When teamed with or supervised by minorities in this or other DH films, whatever other inadequacies McClane may bemoan, he does not engage in racist speech toward “friendlies.” While Farrell is certainly portrayed as lacking masculinity, McClane himself never directs homophobic slurs toward Farrell.
I have no trouble admitting McClane has a problem with gender equity, but his patriarchial view of women is a running subplot throughout the series and is rarely portrayed as working out in the long run. He begins each film estranged from his wife and daughter. Though by the credits roll there appears to be some resolution, by the next film, “he still hasn’t learned.” This is far from a cheer for feminism, but it doesn’t bode too well for misogyny either.
July 23, 2007 at 8:18 pm
Great review!
December 1, 2007 at 3:11 am
just watched it today and the movie was ok, better than i expected.
his comments about the asian character about here being a asian hooker/ninja/bitch didnt translate too well on screen in my view. what if the character was white or black? would it sound harsher if white ***** or black ***** was used? i think it would.
some of these movie makers need to start thinking hard about these lines they put in their movies. why does it seem like there are more derogatory comments about asians today than any other group on screen?
i was having a good time watching a neat action movie and then willis has to throw these awkward jokes in halfway into the movie. i found myself cheering for the female villain because bruce looked like the bad guy there. the humor has worn off to be honest.
September 2, 2010 at 7:06 pm
The racism in this film was thoughtless and crass - I think I know where the screenwriters were going, but it didn’t come across well at all.