mediaabout
Email Email
Print Print

S I G H T S

 


Attack of the 
Star Wars Menace


by Robert E. Schnakenberg

Well, the much-anticipated fifth installment of George Lucas’ Star Wars saga, Attack of the Clones, has finally opened, raking in $110 million in its first four days despite lukewarm reviews. Fanboys from sea to shining sea are lining up for their third, fourth and fifth viewings, steeling themselves to debate its finer points until their beanie propellors spin off from overstimulation. Magazine racks teem with cover stories about this masterpiece of American popular entertainment, for which we all have waited so patiently, and its legendary creator, who is considered a god.

There’s only one problem: I’m immune. I hate Star Wars.

Allow me to clarify: I don’t just hate this Star Wars movie. I don’t think the so-called "prequel trilogy" is failing to live up to the high standards set by the first three films. I don’t just hate Jar-Jar. I hate Star Wars. Period. I have loathed it since I was 8 years old.

How do I hate thee, Star Wars? Let me count the ways. You drove a stake through the heart of a golden age of American auteurist cinema. You foisted your creator’s bland, take-no-risks, make-no-one comfortable artistic vision on an entire generation of filmmakers. You turned movies into comfort food.

Chinatown. Taxi Driver. Midnight Cowboy. Network. These were some of the mainstream features Hollywood produced in the decade before Star Wars.

Gremlins. The Goonies. Ghostbusters. Beverly Hills Cop. These were the witless, soulless individually wrapped slices of cinematic cheese that followed in its wake.

Is it wrong to ascribe the aesthetic decline of an entire sector of the entertainment industry to one film? Perhaps. Certainly Star Wars was not alone in ushering in the era of the blockbuster. Jaws and The Towering Inferno before it did their part as well. But it was Star Wars that gave big-budget schlock a veneer of artistic integrity.

Nominated for 10 Academy Awards in 1977 (it won six of them, and was even given its own special award for the film’s robot sound effects), the crowd-pleasing sci-fi epic wowed even the gimlet-eyed critics of the 1970s. The New Yorker legitimized it with an enthusiastic review. Discotheques pulsated with dance versions of its theme music (that never happened with Towering Inferno). Pundits everywhere hailed it as a nationwide cultural sensation.

I remember, because I was there. A sci-fi obsessed 8-year-old the summer Star Wars was released, I seemed to be the perfect receptor for the film’s fast-paced brand of interstellar adventure. All my friends at school had seen the movie and raved about it, so I begged my dad to take me and not leave me at a disadvantage in our Little League dugout bull sessions. We went to the local Cineplex one Saturday afternoon, the lights went down, and …

Nothing happened.

Star Wars left me cold. I couldn’t put it into words at the time, but as my vocabulary improved so did the brief I cultivated against the film, to the consternation of many of my male friends, who considered such charges nothing short of blasphemy. That Star Wars was a half-baked melange of old Saturday morning serial plots gussied up with some pseudo Manichean west coast spiritual malarkey, I thought, could not be refuted.

I cringed at the lameness of the byplay between Han Solo and Princess Leia, like one of those romantic subplots MGM used to graft onto a Marx Brothers movie. I rolled my eyes at Darth Vader, as heavy-handed and obvious in his huge black helmet as a moustache-twirler from an old two-reel western. I blanched at the sheer bloodlessness of California-issue leading man Mark Hamill.

But it was the film’s simplistic vision of good and evil that irked me most of all. Having been raised on the dark and ominous sci-fi films of the 50s, like Invaders from Mars and Invasion of the Body Snatchers, I found Star Wars almost atavistic in its soothing squareness. Watching it was like eating pastrami on white bread. Ersatz. Insipid. Tiresome and boring.

A quarter century has done nothing to change my opinion. I did not go to see the second film in the series, or the third. I caught bits and piece of both The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi when they appeared on cable, and saw nothing in their muppetry to make me reconsider my appraisal. I read up on George Lucas and found out that he had been a motive force in the creation of one of the best films of the 1970s, Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now. I thanked the Force that he hadn’t followed through on his plans to direct that film, and that it had gotten made before Lucas’ own magnum opus poisoned the well for its like.

After Star Wars, Hollywood’s machers more or less cut off the capital spigot to truly visionary filmmakers, opting instead to turn out schlockbuster after schlockbuster. Think about it: Was there one major studio release in the 1980s, other than Raging Bull, that packed the discomforting power of Lenny, The Deer Hunter or The Conversation? Have there been that many since? Not until American Beauty took home the Best Picture Oscar in 1999 did a film as dark and disturbing as those earlier triumphs win over a popular audience outside the art houses.

Most distressingly of all, the simplistic moral calculus of Star Wars became the template not only for America’s filmmakers, but for our entire culture for more than a decade. Overnight, it seemed, the world of Watergate and Vietnam, the vision of moral ambiguity reflected in the works of Polanski and Scorsese, was gone, replaced by Lucas’ vision of black-cloaked villains and simon-pure heroes — in short, the world of Ronald Reagan and Oliver North. The nuanced conception of evil depicted in films like Chinatown and The Conversation, of an evil that implicates you, no matter how good your intentions, was supplanted by the shoot-first-and-ask-ethical-questions-never ethos of Rambo.

The consequences of that retreat from ourselves seeped into politics as well. Would Ronald Reagan’s designation of the Soviet Union as "the Evil Empire" have attained such popular salience had Lucas not placed the image of helmeted, dehumanized stormtroopers in our national consciousness?

Still, millions of people were entertained, and in a post-Watergate, post-Vietnam era, that was what people wanted, we were told. Amazingly, for the majority of American moviegoers, that diverting reverie has now lasted 25 years. And I blame Star Wars.

Pauline Kael, one of the few major critics at the time to pan the film (in a piece that also ran in The New Yorker), wrote of the original Star Wars, "The excitement of those who call it the film of the year goes way past nostalgia to the feeling that now is the time to return to childhood." As war-weary patrons pack the multiplexes to gobble up George Lucas’ latest slice of cinematic meat loaf, it seems, unfortunately, that it is still that time. May the empire’s reign end soon.



P o p  F o r u m
Star Wars: Fan or foe?


Robert E. Schnakenberg is a writer living in Brooklyn, N.Y. He is the author of The Encyclopedia Shatnerica and a major contributor to The St. James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture. He previously wrote about celebrity boxing matches for the C-SPAN crowd.

Related Sites:
From PopPolitics, read A Very Messy Universe, Cynthia Fuch’s review of Star Wars: Episode II — Attack of the Clones.
In Galactic Gasbag, Steven Hart of Salon argues against some of the interpretations of Star Wars.
For an intelligent look at films and their relationship to society, visit Images Journal.


4 Responses to “Attack of the Star Wars Menace”

  1. Simon Bermuda Says:

    And what makes it even worse is that Star Wars is almost universally mislabelled as science fiction, when it’s really just an Arabian Nights adventure fantasy dressed up in SF trappings. On the other hand, the technical polish of a film like Blade Runner - and, indeed, the budget required to achieve that polish - owes a lot to Star Wars’ triumph at the box office.

  2. Dismissive Says:

    Looks like someone was pantsed in line back in 1977.

    First, saying that Lucas released a “take no risks” movie is a self-serving lie that takes the cake. Furthermore, bemoaning the pretentious anti-fun, anti-enjoyment slugabed “auteur” crap from Hollywood in the early to mid seventies is deluded to the point of mockery.

    Get over yourself, bucko.

  3. RK Says:

    Blaming all society’s ills on one movie is a touch over the top. Perhaps you should look more deeply into the society that actually produced such a movie rather than the movie itself.

  4. force fx lightsaber Says:

    Some good points raised in the comments above and I couldn’t agree more. The success of Episode IV paved the way for a whole host of great sci-fi movies that would subsequently be released.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word